Construction sites in Georgia are known for their inherent dangers, where heavy machinery, towering structures, and demanding physical labor create an environment ripe for accidents. Unfortunately, construction accidents can lead to severe injuries that significantly impact a worker’s life, both physically and financially. However, the process of filing a construction accident claim becomes more complex when the injured worker has a pre-existing medical condition. Understanding how pre-existing conditions affect construction accident claims in Georgia is crucial for any worker or their family navigating the legal landscape after a construction accident.
Understanding Pre-existing Conditions
A pre-existing condition refers to any injury, illness, or health issue that a person had before the accident occurred. These conditions can range from chronic back pain, arthritis, and heart conditions to previous injuries that never fully healed. In the context of a construction accident claim, insurance companies often scrutinize pre-existing conditions, arguing that the injury sustained in the accident was not solely caused by the incident but was rather an exacerbation of an existing condition.
The existence of a pre-existing condition can make it challenging to prove that the construction accident was the primary cause of the injury. Insurance companies and defense lawyers may argue that the worker’s current symptoms are related more to their pre-existing condition than to the accident itself. This tactic is often used to reduce or deny compensation to the injured worker. Therefore, it is essential to understand how pre-existing conditions are viewed under Georgia law and how they can affect the outcome of a construction accident claim.
Georgia Law and Pre-existing Conditions
Georgia law follows the “eggshell plaintiff” doctrine, which means that a defendant must take a plaintiff as they find them. This legal principle implies that if a worker with a pre-existing condition is injured in a construction accident, the defendant (usually the employer or their insurance company) cannot escape liability simply because the worker was more susceptible to injury due to their pre-existing condition. In other words, if the construction accident aggravated or worsened the pre-existing condition, the defendant could still be held liable for the full extent of the injury.
Attorney - Partner Attorney - Partner Associate Attorney
Leland Malchow
Chris Johnson
Dane Anderson
However, the challenge lies in proving that the construction accident did, in fact, aggravate the pre-existing condition. This is where medical evidence becomes crucial. The injured worker must demonstrate through medical records, testimony, and other forms of evidence that the construction accident directly contributed to the worsening of their pre-existing condition. This can be a complex process, especially when dealing with insurance companies that are determined to minimize their payout.
The Role of Medical Evidence in Construction Accident Claims
Medical evidence plays a pivotal role in construction accident claims involving pre-existing conditions. The injured worker’s medical history will be thoroughly examined to establish the extent of the pre-existing condition before the accident and how the accident impacted that condition. This process often involves comparing medical records from before and after the accident, as well as obtaining statements from medical professionals who treated the worker.
Doctors may be asked to provide detailed accounts of the worker’s condition before the accident, including the severity of symptoms, the type of treatment received, and the level of functionality the worker had. After the accident, the medical professionals must clearly outline how the worker’s condition has changed, including any new symptoms, increased pain, or reduced ability to perform daily activities. The goal is to show a clear connection between the construction accident and the exacerbation of the pre-existing condition.
Additionally, the injured worker may need to undergo independent medical examinations (IMEs) requested by the insurance company. These examinations are conducted by doctors chosen by the insurance company, and their findings are often used to challenge the worker’s claims. It is crucial for the worker to be honest during these examinations while also being aware that the doctor conducting the IME may have a bias toward minimizing the worker’s injuries.
They made everything easy for me! Even when I lost faith in the car accident where a drunk driver hit me, they helped me through every process. They were quick as they could be and made everything easier for me while being in the process of my move to Japan for the Navy, full time student, and planning my own wedding. I appreciated the help. Thank you!” - Julissa Evans I had the pleasure of allowing Mr. Leland Malchow to represent my case and I would recommend 10star rating if possible. Not only was Mr. Leland very professional and knowledgeable, he also took the time to listen to my frustrations about my situation. He offered a listening ear, as well as some kind motivational advice. Our relationship has been through business only but I would extend a hand to him and the law firm from here on out. Thank you all and God Bless." - Chris Rowland Chris Johnson is an exceptional attorney for car wreck cases. His expertise, clear communication, thorough preparation, and effective negotiation skills led to a favorable outcome. With compassion and support, he guided me through the process, making him highly recommended for anyone in need of a skilled legal advocate." - Jayko Robinett
Challenges in Proving Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions
Proving that a construction accident aggravated a pre-existing condition can be a daunting task. Insurance companies are skilled at arguing that the worker’s current symptoms are merely a continuation of their pre-existing condition rather than a result of the accident. They may try to use the worker’s medical history against them, pointing out previous complaints of pain or disability to suggest that the worker’s current condition is unrelated to the accident.
One common challenge is the “apportionment of damages,” where the insurance company argues that only a portion of the worker’s injury is attributable to the construction accident, with the rest being due to the pre-existing condition. In such cases, the compensation awarded to the worker may be significantly reduced, as the insurance company may only agree to pay for the portion of the injury directly related to the accident.
To overcome these challenges, it is essential for the injured worker to have strong legal representation. A knowledgeable construction accident lawyer will know how to gather the necessary evidence, counter the insurance company’s arguments, and advocate for the worker’s right to full compensation. This may involve obtaining testimony from medical professionals who can clearly explain the link between the construction accident and the aggravation of the pre-existing condition.
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney How Much Is My Personal Injury Claim Worth?Related Videos
The Importance of Legal Representation
Navigating a construction accident claim involving a pre-existing condition is a complex process that requires a deep understanding of Georgia’s workers’ compensation laws, personal injury law, and the tactics used by insurance companies to deny or reduce claims. Without experienced legal representation, an injured worker may find themselves at a significant disadvantage when facing insurance adjusters and defense lawyers who are skilled at minimizing payouts.
A construction accident lawyer can help by conducting a thorough investigation of the accident, gathering all necessary evidence, and working with medical professionals to establish the extent of the injury and how it relates to the pre-existing condition. They can also negotiate with the insurance company on behalf of the worker, ensuring that the worker’s rights are protected and that they receive the compensation they deserve.
In some cases, a construction accident claim may need to go to court if a fair settlement cannot be reached. Having an experienced lawyer by your side can make all the difference in the outcome of the case. They will be able to present a compelling argument in court, supported by evidence and testimony, to demonstrate that the construction accident was the primary cause of the worker’s injury, even if a pre-existing condition was involved.
Settlements and Compensation
When it comes to compensation, the presence of a pre-existing condition can impact the amount of money a worker may receive in a settlement or court award. However, this does not mean that the worker is not entitled to compensation. Under Georgia law, if the construction accident aggravated a pre-existing condition, the injured worker is entitled to compensation for the full extent of the injury, including any additional medical treatment, lost wages, and pain and suffering resulting from the exacerbation of the condition.
Settlements in these cases can vary widely, depending on the severity of the injury, the strength of the evidence, and the negotiating skills of the worker’s lawyer. It is important to remember that insurance companies are in the business of paying out as little as possible, so they will often try to lowball the injured worker with an initial settlement offer. This is why it is crucial to have a lawyer who can accurately assess the value of the claim and negotiate for a fair settlement that reflects the true extent of the injury.
If a fair settlement cannot be reached, the case may go to trial, where a judge or jury will determine the amount of compensation. In these situations, having a strong legal advocate is essential to presenting a persuasive case and securing the compensation needed to cover medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
Pre-existing conditions can complicate construction accident claims in Georgia, but they do not eliminate the possibility of receiving compensation. Understanding how Georgia law treats pre-existing conditions, gathering strong medical evidence, and having experienced legal representation are all critical factors in achieving a successful outcome in a construction accident claim.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a construction accident and has a pre-existing condition, it is vital to seek the guidance of a knowledgeable lawyer who can help navigate the complexities of your claim. The attorneys at Nimmons Malchow Johnson Injury Lawyers have extensive experience in handling construction accident claims and understand the challenges posed by pre-existing conditions. They are committed to helping injured workers in Georgia obtain the compensation they deserve. For a consultation, please contact Nimmons Malchow Johnson Injury Lawyers today.